Tag Archives: National Security

Lessons for the Next Twenty Years: What We’ve Learned in the Two Decades Since 9/11

A Note from Editor-in-Chief William C. Banks

By any measure the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 brought an immediate laser focus to the phenomenon of international terrorism.

Though hardly new to the United States and the world in 2001, the 9/11 attacks instantaneously elevated countering international terrorism to the dominant national security imperative at home and abroad.

Questions were legion: Should we have known the attacks were coming? What could we have done to prevent them? What lessons learned will help forestall the next attack? What are the best options for countering international terrorism?

Twenty years later many lessons have been learned, even as we continue to struggle with the ever changing dynamics of global terrorism. JNSLP is honored to publish this Special Edition, “Lessons Learned for the Next Twenty Years: What We’ve Learned in the Two Decades Since 9/11.”

Special recognition and thanks are due to Guest Editor Matt Kronisch and Director of the Syracuse University Institute for Security Policy and Law Jamie Baker. Matt and Jamie approached us with the idea for a Special Edition, and then Matt worked miracles in securing commitments from an extraordinary assemblage of distinguished veterans of the larger national security and counterterrorism field to prepare short essays commemorating through various lenses what the two decades since 9/11 have shown.

Spend a moment glancing at the Table of Contents for the Special Edition and you will recognize many of the names and you will correctly anticipate that a deep dive into this marvelous collection of essays is a must.


Foreword
Thomas H. Kean & Lee H. Hamilton

Introduction
Matthew L. Kronisch

PART I: THE CENTRALITY OF INSTITUTIONS, POLICY, AND PROCESS

Staying Left of Boom: The Central and Essential Role of the NSC
James E. Baker

Lessons from the Past Twenty Years—A Former National Security Policymaker and Intelligence Community Leader’s Perspective
Michael G. Vickers

Reflections on Twenty Years of Counterterrorism Strategy and Policy
Nicholas J. Rasmussen

From 9/11 to 1/6: Lessons for Congress from Twenty Years of War, Legislation, and Spiraling Partisanship
Dakota S. Rudesill

Jack of All Trades, Master of None: Managing the Intelligence Community of the Future
Corin R. Stone

National Security Decision-Making in the Age of Technology: Delivering Outcomes On Time and On Target
Gary P. Corn

PART II: THE TOOLS OF INFLUENCE AND ACCESS

USSOCOM and SOF: War Around the Edges
Eric T. Olson

Cables from the Field: A Diplomat’s Lessons from the Two Decades Since 9/11
Anne W. Patterson

Lessons Learned After Twenty Years of Hostilities: The Use of Force and the Law of Armed Conflict
Kenneth Watkin

Wielding the Tools of Economic Statecraft
Brent J. McIntosh

PART III: SURVEILLANCE, OVERSIGHT, SKEPTICISM, AND RACE

Lessons for the Next Twenty Years: What the Two Decades Since 9/11 Have Taught Us About the Future of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Law
David S. Kris

Reflections on the IG’s Role, Stellarwind, and the Information Sharing Fiasco
Joel Brenner

Data Collection: Lessons of Cost-Benefit Analysis, Skepticism, and Legal Transparency
James X. Dempsey

Reflections on Security, Race, and Rights Twenty-Years After 9/11
Sahar F. Aziz

PART IV: DOMESTIC TERROR AND THE FIGHT TO SUSTAIN DEMOCRACY

Counterterrorism 2.0
Deborah Pearlstein

Lessons for Countering the Domestic Terrorism Threat 20 Years After 9/11
Mary B. McCord

Learning From Our Mistakes: How Not to Confront White Supremacist Violence
Mike German

Send Airplanes, Phones, and Money: Cautionary Lessons For the Post-1/6 World from the Post-9/11 World
Paul Rosenzweig

A Twenty-Year Lesson: The Role of Civil Rights in Securing Our Nation
Kareem W. Shora

National Security and Access, a Structural Perspective

Public access to court proceedings is a constitutional dictate and yet, since Sept. 11, 2001, the executive branch has pushed for secrecy to shroud the courtroom in the name of national security. Too often, courts have acquiesced despite the fact that access plays a crucial role in checking inter-branch conflicts, providing the electorate the information it needs to function and guaranteeing a fair trial and policing executive abuses.

Matthew L. Schafer attempts to reset the discussion on the right of access by taking an interest-based approach informed by the role that access plays throughout the Constitution. He proposes that access is not simply meant to ensure that all parties act properly or that all witnesses tell the truth. Rather, access is meant to ensure that our constitutional system works as intended by advancing the interests the Founders thought important.

It Takes a Family: How Military Spousal Laws and Policies Impact National Security

Caitlin Dunham writes that military readiness is a key component to achieving the US Department of Defense’s mission of protecting the security of our country. Support for the troops is conveyed in advertisements and professional sports, and by politicians and citizens across the country. However, the role of the military spouse is not often thought of being crucial to military readiness. Yet, a military spouse can strongly impact readiness through service member retention.

A military spouse’s outlook regarding the military is closely linked with a current service member’s likelihood to stay in the military. The more positive the military spouse views his or her time as a part of a military family, the more likely the service member is to stay in the military. A military spouse is more likely to have positive views of the military if he or she is afforded sufficient educational and professional opportunities.