Analyzing the Legality and Effectiveness of US Targeted Killing

A drone targeted as seen through a camera

Laurie Blank discusses a new approach to analyze the legality and effectiveness of US targeted killing. She suggests that targeted killing should be viewed through a lens that combines the effectiveness and legality metrics while also focusing on the essential issue of legitimacy.

Blank then explores the effectiveness of targeted killing through a legal lens by exploring three considerations: the role of legal compliance in maximizing effectiveness, the interplay between effectiveness and legitimacy, and the United States’ efforts to shape the law to enhance the effectiveness and availability of the tactic.

Blank concludes that targeted killing is an effective means to enhance legal compliance and achieve national security objectives in the short term, but she highlights that the tactic risks applicable laws evolving in a way unfavorable for U interests in the long term.

By Laurie Blank

Assistant Professor, Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy; Academic Head, International Program in Government (RRIS); Senior Researcher, International Institute for Counter-Terrorism, Reichman University; Adjunct Scholar, Modern War Institute (West Point); Senior Fellow, Lieber Institute of Law and Land Warfare (West Point).

1 comment

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *