United States v. Ghailani (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2010)

* United States v. Ghailani (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2010)

Judge Kaplan has now released his full opinion (with redactions) supporting his decision last week to exclude Abebe from testifying against Ghailani. The opinion explains, in brief, that the judge simply did not believe Abebe’s claim that he was testifying of his own free will and, hence, that he likely would have come forward to testify even if the government had not learned of him through coercive interrogation of Ghailani. Interestingly, Judge Kaplan also included a footnote at the end observing that the result might well be the same were this issue to arise in a military commission. A

Anyway, the opinion is posted here.

By Robert M. Chesney

Robert M. Chesney is Charles I. Francis Professor in Law at UT-Austin School of Law. Chesney is a national security law specialist, with a particular interest in problems associated with terrorism. Professor Chesney recently served in the Justice Department in connection with the Detainee Policy Task Force created by Executive Order 13493. He is a member of the Advisory Committee of the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Law and National Security, a senior editor for the Journal of National Security Law & Policy, an associate member of the Intelligence Science Board, a non-resident senior fellow of the Brookings Institution, a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and a member of the American Law Institute. Professor Chesney has published extensively on topics ranging from detention and prosecution in the counterterrorism context to the states secrets privilege. He served previously as chair of the Section on National Security Law of the Association of American Law Schools and as editor of the National Security Law Report (published by the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Law and National Security). His upcoming projects include two books under contract with Oxford University Press, one concerning the evolution of detention law and policy and the other examining the judicial role in national security affairs.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *