<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Journal of National Security Law &#38; Policy &#187; Erwin Chemerinsky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jnslp.com/author/erwin-chemerinsky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jnslp.com</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s only peer-reviewed journal devoted exclusively to national security law and policy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Enemy Combatants and Separation of Powers</title>
		<link>http://jnslp.com/2005/06/15/enemy-combatants-and-separation-of-powers/</link>
		<comments>http://jnslp.com/2005/06/15/enemy-combatants-and-separation-of-powers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erwin Chemerinsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laws of War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vol. 1 No. 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jnslp.com/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In two cases decided on June 28, 2004, the Supreme Court emphatically upheld the rule of law and the right of those being detained as part of the war on terrorism to have access to the courts. In Rasul v. Bush, the Court held that those being detained in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba are entitled to have a habeas corpus petition heard in federal court. In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, the Justices declared, by an 8-to-1 margin, that an American citizen apprehended in a foreign country and held as an enemy combatant must be accorded due process, including a meaningful factual hearing on his status.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two cases decided on June 28, 2004, the Supreme Court emphatically upheld the rule of law and the right of those being detained as part of the war on terrorism to have access to the courts. In Rasul v. Bush, the Court held that those being detained in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba are entitled to have a habeas corpus petition heard in federal court. In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, the Justices declared, by an 8-to-1 margin, that an American citizen apprehended in a foreign country and held as an enemy combatant must be accorded due process, including a meaningful factual hearing on his status.</p>
<div class="wam_wrap"><h4 class="wam">Attached Files:</h4><ul class="wam_ul"><li><a href='http://jnslp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/04_Cherminsky_Master.pdf' class='wam_link'>Enemy Combatants and Separation of Powers</a></li></ul></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jnslp.com/2005/06/15/enemy-combatants-and-separation-of-powers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
